The 'really good addons' are running texture levels that are positively huge and your video card won't like them in the long run. The more large textures you want to load, the smaller your video memory becomes. There's always a cost and everyone thinks that simply recompiling to 64-bit will make eve...

A 64-bit approach is worthless until the code that controls memory usage is cleaned up and behaving nicely in 32-bit.

No matter how desperately you want 64-bit... it's not the solution to the actual problem. Corrected code is. Once the code behaves... then 64-bit is the next logical step.

Uh... Prepar3D doesn't have the same UI as FSX. What are you referring to?

You used the Estonia Migration Tool that creates bogus Registry entries so you can install FSX products into Prepar3D.

You're going to have to fix your Registry.

Ed Wilson
Senior Developer
Mindstar Aviation

We have to purchase the data, it's not cheap.

Just to update this blog post... Mindstar Aviation has released an update for their 430/530 units address this issue.

Ed Wilson
Senior Developer
Mindstar Aviation

<t>I know everyone's totally enamored with Navigraph and/or NavDataPro from Aerosoft... but to be honest, neither of them have the level of information required for a commercial level training simulation nor are either of them legal for use in a training environment.<br/> <br/> This is first and for...

Bootstrap, you need to contact Mindstar Aviation at their support email regarding your issue. It needs to be looked into.

Ed Wilson
Senior Developer
Mindstar Aviation

<t>Yeah... I have zero access to the Developers ONLY section... Comes up with a 404 error. Explains why I've never, ever seen that in the forum list. Ever.<br/> <br/> I have developer licenses to Prepar3D 1 & 2, my company's work is integrated into Redbird Simulations trainers. Is there some mag...

Sorry, discussing proprietary coding information in a public venue isn't going to happen.

Ed Wilson
Senior Developer
Mindstar Aviation

That article is from 2004 and never happened as far as I know.

<t>The problem is actually a bug in the sim... but since there's no method to actually interact with Lockheed-Martin... it's unlikely to be corrected any time soon. It's a bug that's been around the core sim code since FS9, actually.<br/> <br/> So... while our 430/530 can expose the actual flaw... t...

<t>I hope Lockheed-Martin intends to offer another method of obtaining support interaction for developers... A term paper isn't going to work. Also, regarding avatars... sorry, requiring that we register with yet another company (one we are NOT doing business with) is inappropriate and unprofessiona...

I know people don't like change... but, I don't get the point of this change. You lose functionality and I find the 'term paper' appearance for reports, not discussions.

Sorry, not liking this change.

<t>I don't understand why your view wouldn't be lined up. What you see out the 'window' would be based on the VC view... unless you're using all 2D views? IF you're using all 2D views (not a good idea)... then what you see out the 'window' would be mostly static in position. A VC view can be defined...