Hi,
I'm using RequestGroundInfoOnSimObject for get the SIMCONNECT_DATA_GROUND_INFO.
The class variables like fAlt, eSurfaceType, eSurfaceCondition has correct value.
But the fNormal value something doubtable, specially fNormalJ.
fNormalI, fNormalK value was changed range in 0.0 ~ 0.3.
only fNormalJ value was changed range in 0.95 ~ 1.0.
I think fNormalJ mean up vector like(0, 1, 0). So it has 1.0 value in runway. It is Good.
But In slope like hills, the value changed very small. I want get correct value.
Please help me for care of this problem.
Thank you!
fNormalJ has wrong value.
-
- Lockheed Martin
- Posts: 1207
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 2:34 pm
Re: fNormalJ has wrong value.
Hello,
Can you provide a test case/location where you believe the SimConnect call is providing inaccurate normal information?
Thanks.
Can you provide a test case/location where you believe the SimConnect call is providing inaccurate normal information?
Thanks.
Clifton Crane
Prepar3D® Software Engineer Sr.
Prepar3D® Software Engineer Sr.
Re: fNormalJ has wrong value.
Thank you for reply.
The test case or location is not matter.
Because I never see that the fNormalJ has value of under 0.95.
Another variable like fNormalI, fNormalK has changed range in 0.0 ~ 0.3. It has 0.3 gap.
But fNormalJ's gap is only 0.05.
If my expecting is wrong you can talk to me.
Thank you!
The test case or location is not matter.
Because I never see that the fNormalJ has value of under 0.95.
Another variable like fNormalI, fNormalK has changed range in 0.0 ~ 0.3. It has 0.3 gap.
But fNormalJ's gap is only 0.05.
If my expecting is wrong you can talk to me.
Thank you!
Re: fNormalJ has wrong value.
Thank you for reply.Clifton Crane wrote: ↑Mon Jul 17, 2017 8:21 pm Hello,
Can you provide a test case/location where you believe the SimConnect call is providing inaccurate normal information?
Thanks.
The test case or location is not matter.
Because I never see that the fNormalJ has value of under 0.95.
Another variable like fNormalI, fNormalK has changed range in 0.0 ~ 0.3. It has 0.3 gap.
But fNormalJ's gap is only 0.05.
If my expecting is wrong you can talk to me.
Thank you!